Re: [GENERAL] Re: [SQL] sql 92 support in postgres

From: Oleg Broytmann <phd(at)sun(dot)med(dot)ru>
To: PostgreSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: eric(at)broken(dot)net
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: [SQL] sql 92 support in postgres
Date: 1999-03-26 09:54:27
Message-ID: Pine.SOL2.3.96.SK.990326125112.26085A-100000@sun.med.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-sql

Hi!

On Thu, 25 Mar 1999, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote:
> As to mySQL, I've never used it, but I understand it's a very fast, but

I had some experience with MySQL, and yes - it is very fast.

> limited, subset of SQL. The biggest drawback I see referenced is the
> lack of transaction support.

What is worse, authors of MySQL claimed that transactions and triggers
would never find its way into MySQL, as it slows down every SQL query.

> --
> Ross J. Reedstrom, Ph.D., <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
> NSBRI Research Scientist/Programmer
> Computer and Information Technology Institute
> Rice University, 6100 S. Main St., Houston, TX 77005

Oleg.
----
Oleg Broytmann http://members.xoom.com/phd2/ phd2(at)earthling(dot)net
Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stuart Rison 1999-03-26 11:38:32 Are postgreSQL views UPDATEable?
Previous Message Ty Augustine 1999-03-26 06:32:33 How do I "Insert" using a type member?

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jackson, DeJuan 1999-03-26 16:29:17 RE: [SQL] Odd "problem", not sure if there is a solution ....
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-03-26 03:46:36 Odd "problem", not sure if there is a solution ....