Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL

From: Alex Knight <knight(at)phunc(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Trond Eivind Glomsrød <teg(at)redhat(dot)com>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL
Date: 2001-06-27 22:33:53
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0106271533370.18309-100000@blowfish.phunc.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> > > Even though it may appear that your server is doing a lot, it's not facing
> > > the load of a highly scaled enterprise level e-commerce site, where RedHat
> > > just doesn't cut it.
> >
> > That claim is bogus. Red Hat Linux is the number one linux by far in
> > enterprise deployments.
>
> And MS has more enterprise deployments than RH. Does that make MS
> better than RH?

Absolutely.

-Knight

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Knight 2001-06-27 22:38:24 Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL
Previous Message Steve Wolfe 2001-06-27 22:30:42 Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL