Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL

From: John Clark Naldoza y Lopez <njclark(at)ntsp(dot)nec(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Alex Knight <knight(at)phunc(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Trond Eivind =?iso-2022-jp?B?R2xvbXNy+GQ=?=" <teg(at)redhat(dot)com>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL
Date: 2001-06-28 00:44:49
Message-ID: 3B3A7E01.4A8FFE02@ntsp.nec.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Alex Knight wrote:
>
> > > > Even though it may appear that your server is doing a lot, it's not facing
> > > > the load of a highly scaled enterprise level e-commerce site, where RedHat
> > > > just doesn't cut it.
> > >
> > > That claim is bogus. Red Hat Linux is the number one linux by far in
> > > enterprise deployments.
> >
> > And MS has more enterprise deployments than RH. Does that make MS
> > better than RH?
>
> Absolutely.
>

Let me think about this.... Ahhhhh nope...;-)

It could mean that MS has marketed there wares more strategically than
any other product, paying for positive advertisement helps you quite a
bit in the sales category...;-)

But hey, that's your freedom to think, act, speak, and decide.

--
/) John Clark Naldoza y Lopez (\
/ ) Software Design Engineer II ( \
_( (_ _ Web-Application Development _) )_
(((\ \> /_> Cable Modem Network Management System <_\ </ /)))
(\\\\ \_/ / NEC Telecom Software Phils., Inc. \ \_/ ////)
\ / \ /
\ _/ phone: (+63 32) 233-9142 loc. 3112 \_ /
/ / cellphone: (+63 919) 399-4742 \ \
/ / email: njclark(at)ntsp(dot)nec(dot)co(dot)jp \ \

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Church 2001-06-28 00:48:10 Re: Blobs in PostgreSQL
Previous Message Alex Knight 2001-06-27 23:58:22 Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL