From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Trond Eivind Glomsrød <teg(at)redhat(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alex Knight <knight(at)phunc(dot)com>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2001-06-27 22:27:37 |
Message-ID: | 200106272227.f5RMRbM25920@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> > Even though it may appear that your server is doing a lot, it's not facing
> > the load of a highly scaled enterprise level e-commerce site, where RedHat
> > just doesn't cut it.
>
> That claim is bogus. Red Hat Linux is the number one linux by far in
> enterprise deployments.
And MS has more enterprise deployments than RH. Does that make MS
better than RH?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steve Wolfe | 2001-06-27 22:30:42 | Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Alex Knight | 2001-06-27 22:16:36 | Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL |