Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Trond Eivind Glomsrød <teg(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: Alex Knight <knight(at)phunc(dot)com>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL
Date: 2001-06-27 22:27:37
Message-ID: 200106272227.f5RMRbM25920@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> > Even though it may appear that your server is doing a lot, it's not facing
> > the load of a highly scaled enterprise level e-commerce site, where RedHat
> > just doesn't cut it.
>
> That claim is bogus. Red Hat Linux is the number one linux by far in
> enterprise deployments.

And MS has more enterprise deployments than RH. Does that make MS
better than RH?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Wolfe 2001-06-27 22:30:42 Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL
Previous Message Alex Knight 2001-06-27 22:16:36 Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL