From: | Alex Knight <knight(at)phunc(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
Cc: | Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2001-06-27 20:15:54 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0106271314490.18309-100000@blowfish.phunc.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 June 2001 15:35, Alex Knight wrote:
> > On 27 Jun 2001, Vivek Khera wrote:
> > > This is not the same in my book, since I don't
> > > care to run RHL in any kind of production environment.
>
> > Agreed over here.
>
> Disagreed over here, with 4+ years of experience 24x7 on RHL since RHL 4.1.
>
> And what about the SPECweb99 record just set by TUX on RHL 7.1 by an IBM
> server? :-)
This 4+ years 24/7 experience isn't on that server you said was for
internal purposes with low load you mentioned in a previous post, is it?
> All indications the reports have given is that the RedHat Database code is
> going to be open-source -- now, as to what license their modifications will
> be released under is anybody's guess -- but my educated guess would be the
> same old PostgreSQL license we know and love, with a minor addition to the
> copyright notice that 'Portions Copyright Red Hat Software, Inc.' Thus the
> PostgreSQL Global Development Group would be free to incorporate such
> modifications if we so saw fit to do so.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos | 2001-06-27 20:26:07 | Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Tim Barnard | 2001-06-27 20:04:27 | Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL |