Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL

<snip>
...This is not the same in my book, since I don't care
to run RHL in any kind of production environment...
<snip>

What is it about RHL that various people wouldn't
recommend running it in a production envornment?
I don't have a contrary view, so much as I'd like to
know what's specifically wrong with the RH distribution.
We're trying to decide on a distribution on which to
develop telecom software, utilizing PostgreSQL of
course :-) What other distributions would you
recommend and why?

Tim

----- Original Message -----
From: "Alex Knight" <knight(at)phunc(dot)com>
To: "Vivek Khera" <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 12:35 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL

> On 27 Jun 2001, Vivek Khera wrote:
>
> > >>>>> "BM" == Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >
> > BM> Here is a press release stating Red Hat will offer commercial
support
> > BM> for PostgreSQL:
> >
> > BM> http://www.redhat.com/about/presscenter/2001/press_database.html
> >
> > My read is that they're supporting their integrated OS+DB package, not
> > PostgreSQL directly. This is not the same in my book, since I don't
> > care to run RHL in any kind of production environment.
>
> Agreed over here.
>
> -knight
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
>