Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL

From: "Thalis A(dot) Kalfigopoulos" <thalis(at)cs(dot)pitt(dot)edu>
To: Tim Barnard <tbarnard(at)povn(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL
Date: 2001-06-27 20:26:07
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0106271623110.32402-100000@aluminum.cs.pitt.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Tim Barnard wrote:

> <snip>
> ...This is not the same in my book, since I don't care
> to run RHL in any kind of production environment...
> <snip>
>
> What is it about RHL that various people wouldn't
> recommend running it in a production envornment?
> I don't have a contrary view, so much as I'd like to
> know what's specifically wrong with the RH distribution.
> We're trying to decide on a distribution on which to
> develop telecom software, utilizing PostgreSQL of
> course :-) What other distributions would you
> recommend and why?
>
> Tim

Now that they will unite the OS with the DB, I can't think of more suitable environment for the Sys/DB admin's paradise. That is, if they do indeed make significant changes to the operating system they are shipping in the RHDB.

cheers,
thalis

ps. no, i don't personally use Rh.

>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alex Knight" <knight(at)phunc(dot)com>
> To: "Vivek Khera" <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>
> Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 12:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL
>
>
> > On 27 Jun 2001, Vivek Khera wrote:
> >
> > > >>>>> "BM" == Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > >
> > > BM> Here is a press release stating Red Hat will offer commercial
> support
> > > BM> for PostgreSQL:
> > >
> > > BM> http://www.redhat.com/about/presscenter/2001/press_database.html
> > >
> > > My read is that they're supporting their integrated OS+DB package, not
> > > PostgreSQL directly. This is not the same in my book, since I don't
> > > care to run RHL in any kind of production environment.
> >
> > Agreed over here.
> >
> > -knight
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
> >
> > http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2001-06-27 20:27:38 Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL
Previous Message Alex Knight 2001-06-27 20:15:54 Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL