Re: Any reason to use pg_dumpall on an idle database

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Any reason to use pg_dumpall on an idle database
Date: 2000-05-25 22:40:55
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0005251940420.80347-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 25 May 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Seems a typical file system backup is fine on an idle database, right?

how do you know its idle, and/or will remain so?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ross J. Reedstrom 2000-05-25 23:02:00 Re: Re: gram.y PROBLEM with UNDER
Previous Message Andrew McMillan 2000-05-25 22:36:05 Re: Any reason to use pg_dumpall on an idle database