Re: Any reason to use pg_dumpall on an idle database

From: Andrew McMillan <Andrew(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Any reason to use pg_dumpall on an idle database
Date: 2000-05-25 22:36:05
Message-ID: 392DAAD5.C8CFC1F5@catalyst.net.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Seems a typical file system backup is fine on an idle database, right?

A file system backup will only work on a set of databases, won't it?

Cheers,
Andrew.
--
_____________________________________________________________________
Andrew McMillan, e-mail: Andrew(at)cat-it(dot)co(dot)nz
Catalyst IT Ltd, PO Box 10-225, Level 22, 105 The Terrace, Wellington
Me: +64 (21) 635 694, Fax: +64 (4) 499 5596, Office: +64 (4) 499 2267

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-05-25 22:40:55 Re: Any reason to use pg_dumpall on an idle database
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-05-25 22:28:42 Any reason to use pg_dumpall on an idle database