Re: Re: gram.y PROBLEM with UNDER

From: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
To: Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: gram.y PROBLEM with UNDER
Date: 2000-05-25 23:02:00
Message-ID: 20000525180200.A28194@rice.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 04:49:21PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes, even I don't apply those, though they say I never met a patch I
> > > didn't like. :-)
> >
> > Bruce, your going to _make_ me grovel through the archives, and prove
> > that you were the first one to say that aren't you?
>
> I believe it was a Thomas Lockhart line.

O.K., first one _I_ saw say that.

Ross
P.S. you do all us occasional patchers a great service. Don't change a
thing ;-)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-05-25 23:14:29 Re: Any reason to use pg_dumpall on an idle database
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-05-25 22:40:55 Re: Any reason to use pg_dumpall on an idle database