pg_stat_reset() weirdness

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: pg_stat_reset() weirdness
Date: 2002-08-09 05:49:18
Message-ID: GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOMEJNCDAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi guys,

If you apply the pg_stat_reset() function patch you get this regression
failure. Is this because it's returning a bool I guess? Shall I just fix
the regression test to exclude this function?

Chris

*** ./expected/opr_sanity.out Fri Jul 19 07:11:32 2002
--- ./results/opr_sanity.out Fri Aug 9 13:26:00 2002
***************
*** 27,34 ****
AND p1.proname !~ 'costestimate$'
AND p1.proname != 'update_pg_pwd_and_pg_group';
oid | proname
! -----+---------
! (0 rows)

-- Look for conflicting proc definitions (same names and input datatypes).
-- (This test should be dead code now that we have the unique index
--- 27,35 ----
AND p1.proname !~ 'costestimate$'
AND p1.proname != 'update_pg_pwd_and_pg_group';
oid | proname
! ------+---------------
! 2249 | pg_stat_reset
! (1 row)

-- Look for conflicting proc definitions (same names and input datatypes).
-- (This test should be dead code now that we have the unique index

======================================================================

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Elphick 2002-08-09 06:34:48 Re: [HACKERS] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2002-08-09 05:07:17 Re: [HACKERS] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS