Re: pg_stat_reset() weirdness

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_stat_reset() weirdness
Date: 2002-08-09 15:26:08
Message-ID: 3D53DF10.8010304@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> If you apply the pg_stat_reset() function patch you get this regression
> failure. Is this because it's returning a bool I guess? Shall I just fix
> the regression test to exclude this function?

> AND p1.proname != 'update_pg_pwd_and_pg_group';
> oid | proname
> ! ------+---------------
> ! 2249 | pg_stat_reset
> ! (1 row)

Likely because this is now in CVS:

DATA(insert OID = 2249 ( record PGNSP PGUID 4 t p t \054 0 0
oidin oidout i p f 0 -1 0 _null_ _null_ ));
#define RECORDOID 2249

The Oids conflict.

Joe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2002-08-09 16:01:56 Re: stand-alone composite types patch (was [HACKERS] Proposal:
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-08-09 14:33:22 Re: CREATE TEMP TABLE .... ON COMMIT