| From: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk>, mark Kirkwood <markir(at)slingshot(dot)co(dot)nz> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS |
| Date: | 2002-08-09 05:07:17 |
| Message-ID: | 200208090107.17117.lamar.owen@wgcr.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Thursday 08 August 2002 05:36 pm, Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
> Matt Kirkwood wrote:
> > I just spent some of the morning helping a customer build Pg 7.2.1 from
> > source in order to get Linux largefile support in pg_dump etc. They
> > possibly would have kept using the binary RPMs if they had this feature.
And you added this by doing what, exactly? I'm not familiar with pg_dump
largefile support as a standalone feature.
> > (I am presuming that such RPMs are built by the Pg community and
> > "supplied" to the various distros... apologies if I have this all
> > wrong...)
You have this wrong. The distributions do periodically sync up with my
revision, and I with theirs, but they do their own packaging.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oliver Elphick | 2002-08-09 06:34:48 | Re: [HACKERS] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2002-08-09 04:43:51 | Re: Question: merit / feasibility of compressing frontend |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-08-09 05:49:18 | pg_stat_reset() weirdness |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-08-09 03:59:00 | Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations |