From: Jim Nasby <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: PGSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:
Date: 2006-08-03 18:33:35
Message-ID: F0D8A119-F876-4AE5-99DD-79A3CC595003@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

I'm at a client who's an ASP; they've written their app such that each
customer gets their own database. Rigth now they're at nearly 200
databases, and were thinking that they "must be the largest PostgreSQL
install in the world". :) After taking them down a notch or two, I
started wondering how many sites could beat 200 databases in a single
cluster. I'm sure there's any number that can, though 200 databases in a
cluster certainly isn't mainstream.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

Responses

  • Re: at 2006-08-03 19:15:22 from Steinar H. Gunderson
  • Re: at 2006-08-03 19:29:42 from Chris Hoover

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steinar H. Gunderson 2006-08-03 19:15:22 Re:
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-08-03 16:39:46 Re: Strange behaviour