Re:

From: "Steinar H(dot) Gunderson" <sgunderson(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re:
Date: 2006-08-03 19:15:22
Message-ID: 20060803191522.GA22878@uio.no
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 01:33:35PM -0500, Jim Nasby wrote:
> I'm at a client who's an ASP; they've written their app such that each
> customer gets their own database. Rigth now they're at nearly 200
> databases, and were thinking that they "must be the largest PostgreSQL
> install in the world". :) After taking them down a notch or two, I
> started wondering how many sites could beat 200 databases in a single
> cluster. I'm sure there's any number that can, though 200 databases in a
> cluster certainly isn't mainstream.

cassarossa:~> psql -h sql -l | grep 'rows)'
(137 rows)

That's our measly student society. :-)

/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/

In response to

  • at 2006-08-03 18:33:35 from Jim Nasby

Responses

  • Re: at 2006-08-03 19:30:40 from Ian Westmacott

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Hoover 2006-08-03 19:29:42 Re:
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2006-08-03 18:33:35