| From: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Addition of extra commit fest entry to park future patches |
| Date: | 2016-03-01 20:35:50 |
| Message-ID: | CACjxUsNnOGidmQs7oabCdgCxuq0iU6BhzXM2XvYOWYtKDXm3-Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> I'd suggest we either name it based on the current tentative
>>> date for CF1 (september), or name it specificaly "9.7-first" or
>>> something like that rather than just plain "future", to make it
>>> more clear.
>>
>> +1 to both names suggested by Magnus.
>
> We do need to pick one of them :)
>
> Anybody else with preferences?
I would prefer to see a consistent namimg pattern (i.e., 2016-09)
and rename it if we reschedule.
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Steele | 2016-03-01 20:36:21 | Re: Addition of extra commit fest entry to park future patches |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2016-03-01 20:28:30 | Re: Addition of extra commit fest entry to park future patches |