Re: Addition of extra commit fest entry to park future patches

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Addition of extra commit fest entry to park future patches
Date: 2016-03-01 20:40:34
Message-ID: 56D5FE42.7060908@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/1/16 3:35 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
>>>> I'd suggest we either name it based on the current tentative
>>>> date for CF1 (september), or name it specificaly "9.7-first" or
>>>> something like that rather than just plain "future", to make it
>>>> more clear.
>>>
>>> +1 to both names suggested by Magnus.
>>
>> We do need to pick one of them :)
>>
>> Anybody else with preferences?
>
> I would prefer to see a consistent namimg pattern (i.e., 2016-09)
> and rename it if we reschedule.

I'm fine with that - it does help set expectations.

--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2016-03-01 20:46:15 Re: Addition of extra commit fest entry to park future patches
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-03-01 20:40:29 Re: Addition of extra commit fest entry to park future patches