Re: Addition of extra commit fest entry to park future patches

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Addition of extra commit fest entry to park future patches
Date: 2016-03-01 20:36:21
Message-ID: 56D5FD45.9070105@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/1/16 3:28 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
> > Yeah, we can do that. I'd suggest we either name it based on the current
> > tentative date for CF1 (september), or name it specificaly "9.7-first" or
> > something like that rather than just plain "future", to make it more clear.
>
> +1 to both names suggested by Magnus.
>
>
>
> We do need to pick one of them :)

I'm good with 9.7-first. I presume it can be renamed later to fit the
standard scheme?

--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-03-01 20:40:29 Re: Addition of extra commit fest entry to park future patches
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2016-03-01 20:35:50 Re: Addition of extra commit fest entry to park future patches