Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Steve Prentice <prentice(at)cisco(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch
Date: 2009-10-08 16:44:53
Message-ID: B86AD548-D7F9-4E01-A689-138F76D87B0B@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Oct 7, 2009, at 9:00 PM, Steve Prentice wrote:

>> Committed with a fair amount of corner-case cleanup and refactoring.
>
> Woot! Thanks for all the hard work getting this committed (Pavel,
> Bernd, Jeff, Tom and others)! I've been really looking forward to
> this feature. Still hoping a solution is found to the plpgsql parser
> issue. If not, I'll have to resubmit my rejected AS patch. :)

+1 Thanks for getting this done.

Now, does this just apply to PL/pgSQL? If so, what needs to happen for
other PLs to support the feature?

Best,

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-10-08 16:46:43 Re: COPY enhancements
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-10-08 16:37:11 Re: COPY enhancements