Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Steve Prentice <prentice(at)cisco(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch
Date: 2009-10-08 16:47:34
Message-ID: 1255020454.10584.12.camel@jdavis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 09:44 -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> +1 Thanks for getting this done.
>
> Now, does this just apply to PL/pgSQL? If so, what needs to happen for
> other PLs to support the feature?

It's just the call notation -- the function only needs to know what
arguments it got for which parameters.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2009-10-08 16:49:33 Re: COPY enhancements
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-10-08 16:46:43 Re: COPY enhancements