Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup
Date: 2001-01-19 18:37:02
Message-ID: 9518.979929422@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I believe the formatting problem was that some code had
> "command;command; : lkjasfd : asldfk" while some had them spread over
> separate lines, and others used \n\, all very randomly. Now at least
> they are all consistent and use similar formatting.

And they may all be broken, except for the one(s) you have tested.
You shouldn't be assuming that a platform that uses gcc necessarily
also uses gas.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-01-19 18:39:22 Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-01-19 18:24:51 Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-01-19 18:39:22 Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-01-19 18:24:51 Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup