Re: pg_terminate_backend

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_terminate_backend
Date: 2006-08-18 13:26:25
Message-ID: 7682.1155907585@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
> Though for the Windows case only, we could easily enough make it
> possible to run pg_ctl kill remotely, since we use a named pipe. Does
> this seem like a good or bad idea?

Seems like we'd be opening a can of security worms :-(

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2006-08-18 13:46:00 Re: Autovacuum on by default?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-08-18 13:25:08 Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)