| From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_terminate_backend |
| Date: | 2006-08-18 13:48:21 |
| Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA35553@algol.sollentuna.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > Though for the Windows case only, we could easily enough make it
> > possible to run pg_ctl kill remotely, since we use a named pipe.
> Does
> > this seem like a good or bad idea?
>
> Seems like we'd be opening a can of security worms :-(
Not really, standard windows ACL already applies to everything, so you
need to be an admin on the machine to make it work.
Anyhoo, I don't really see the gain in it, which also seems to be what
others think, so let's just drop that idea.
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-08-18 13:50:33 | Re: Going for "all green" buildfarm results |
| Previous Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2006-08-18 13:46:00 | Re: Autovacuum on by default? |