Re: [BUGS] ltree::text not immutable?

From: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Joe Van Dyk <joe(at)tanga(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] ltree::text not immutable?
Date: 2014-11-06 21:37:01
Message-ID: 545BE9FD.90700@BlueTreble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On 11/5/14, 7:38 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Attached is a complete patch along these lines. As I suggested earlier,
>> >this just makes the relevant changes in ltree--1.0.sql and
>> >pg_trgm--1.1.sql without bumping their extension version numbers,
>> >since it doesn't seem important enough to justify a version bump.
>> >
> I don't understand why you went to all the trouble of building a
> versioning system for extensions if you're not going to use it.

I was about to dismiss this comment since I don't see any real need for a version bump here, except that AFAIK there's no way to upgrade an extension without bumping the version, other than resorting to hackery.

So I think this does need to be an upgrade. :(
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-11-06 22:07:05 Re: BUG #11902: PostgreSQL 9.5 crashes on alter table in function
Previous Message 'Andres Freund' 2014-11-06 21:24:12 Re: BUG #11902: PostgreSQL 9.5 crashes on alter table in function

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-11-06 21:54:14 Re: BRIN indexes - TRAP: BadArgument
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-11-06 21:30:15 Re: Proposal: Log inability to lock pages during vacuum