Re: Kerberos patch in the queue

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: Dah(at)pdc(dot)kth(dot)se, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Kerberos patch in the queue
Date: 2005-04-15 17:53:56
Message-ID: 5190.1113587636@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
> Tom, assuming we fix this, are you fine with the concept?

Mostly. Should the --with-krb-srvnam configure parameter go away?
Or is it now seen as establishing an installation default? (Either
way implies some documentation work.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2005-04-15 18:38:39 Re: Kerberos patch in the queue
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2005-04-15 17:41:14 Re: Kerberos patch in the queue