Re: pg_dump selectively ignores extension configuration tables

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Vibhor Kumar <vibhor(dot)kumar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump selectively ignores extension configuration tables
Date: 2013-03-25 15:48:17
Message-ID: 515071C1.2020509@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 03/25/2013 08:12 AM, Vibhor Kumar wrote:
> Since, nobody has picked this one.
>
> If there is no objection,then I can test this patch against 9.1 & 9.2.

Here are diffs for 9.1 and 9.2. The previous email was against 9.3 dev.

Joe

--
Joe Conway
credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us
Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source
Training, Service, Consulting, & 24x7 Support

Attachment Content-Type Size
pg_dump_ext_obj-9.1.diff text/x-patch 2.6 KB
pg_dump_ext_obj-9.2.diff text/x-patch 2.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vibhor Kumar 2013-03-25 15:59:17 Re: pg_dump selectively ignores extension configuration tables
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-03-25 15:30:39 Re: Let's invent a function to report lock-wait-blocking PIDs