Re: pg_dump selectively ignores extension configuration tables

From: Vibhor Kumar <vibhor(dot)kumar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Vibhor Kumar <vibhor(dot)kumar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump selectively ignores extension configuration tables
Date: 2013-03-25 16:01:39
Message-ID: 691A64BE-18B1-4CB5-A0BA-DD9200A37672@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Mar 25, 2013, at 10:48 AM, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:

> On 03/25/2013 08:12 AM, Vibhor Kumar wrote:
>> Since, nobody has picked this one.
>>
>> If there is no objection,then I can test this patch against 9.1 & 9.2.
>
> Here are diffs for 9.1 and 9.2. The previous email was against 9.3 dev.

Thanks Joe!

will test both for 9.1 and 9.2

-
Vibhor Kumar
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Blog:http://vibhork.blogspot.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-03-25 16:52:44 Re: DROP OWNED BY fails to drop privileges granted by non-owners (was Re: [GENERAL] Bug, Feature, or what else?)
Previous Message Vibhor Kumar 2013-03-25 15:59:17 Re: pg_dump selectively ignores extension configuration tables