| From: | Vibhor Kumar <vibhor(dot)kumar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump selectively ignores extension configuration tables |
| Date: | 2013-03-25 15:12:05 |
| Message-ID: | BE1CB31B-2137-4C41-8B0A-398BA77471EF@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mar 25, 2013, at 9:56 AM, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
> On 03/14/2013 05:23 PM, Joe Conway wrote:
>> On 03/13/2013 04:16 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
>>> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
>>>> I think it should dump the user data portion, especially since that
>>>> matches what pg_dump would do if you did not specify the table or schema.
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> If you don't have time slots to fix that by then, I will have a look at
>>> fixing that while in beta.
>>
>> Here is a patch against 9.1. If there is agreement with the approach
>> I'll redo for 9.2 and git head and apply.
>
> Any objections before I commit this?
>
>
Since, nobody has picked this one.
If there is no objection,then I can test this patch against 9.1 & 9.2.
Thanks & Regards,
Vibhor Kumar
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Blog:http://vibhork.blogspot.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-03-25 15:17:35 | Re: pg_dump selectively ignores extension configuration tables |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2013-03-25 15:06:25 | Re: pgsql: Add PF_PRINTF_ATTRIBUTE to on_exit_msg_fmt. |