From: | Susanne Ebrecht <susanne(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-docs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | English Grammar question |
Date: | 2011-03-30 08:08:34 |
Message-ID: | 4D92E502.9050804@2ndQuadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Hello,
during translation the history.sgml - I found the following sentences in
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/history.html
"The design of the rule system at that time was described in /The design
of the POSTGRES rules system/
<http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/biblio.html#STON87A>. The
rationale and architecture of the storage manager were detailed in /The
design of the POSTGRES storage system
<http://db.cs.berkeley.edu/papers/ERL-M87-06.pdf>/"
I am not sure if the grammar is correct here.
My feeling says it should be:
"is decribed" and "are detailed" instead of "was and were"
I am pretty sure these books still exist.
Susanne
--
Susanne Ebrecht - 2ndQuadrant
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
www.2ndQuadrant.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2011-03-30 08:15:23 | Re: English Grammar question |
Previous Message | Susanne Ebrecht | 2011-03-29 19:07:08 | found a very confusing and maybe outdated sentence |