Re: English Grammar question

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Susanne Ebrecht <susanne(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: English Grammar question
Date: 2011-03-30 08:15:23
Message-ID: AANLkTini+HFRYLhzOYMMZA7sYLaf3qOaKy6bz22EvGP4@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Susanne Ebrecht
<susanne(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> during translation the history.sgml - I found the following sentences in
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/history.html
>
> "The design of the rule system at that time was described in The design of
> the POSTGRES rules system. The rationale and architecture of the storage
> manager were detailed in The design of the POSTGRES storage system "
>
> I am not sure if the grammar is correct here.
>
> My feeling says it should be:
>
> "is decribed" and "are detailed"  instead of "was and were"
>
> I am pretty sure these books still exist.

It seems fine to me. The tense refers to when it was written, not when
the papers were available (or not).

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2011-03-30 08:18:35 Re: English Grammar question
Previous Message Susanne Ebrecht 2011-03-30 08:08:34 English Grammar question