Re: Git conversion status

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Git conversion status
Date: 2010-09-22 21:46:48
Message-ID: 4C9A7948.8050009@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 09/22/2010 04:55 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> (In particular, I'm avoiding Andrew's preferred alternative with the
> extra local repository; I don't want an asynchronous buffer between me
> and the real repository. I guess if you had a really bad network
> connection it could be useful, but considering how much better this is
> than CVS already, I won't miss whatever savings that might offer.)

Oh, yes, the network saving is enormous. What I suggested is much more
economical of disk space, though (it's the recommended way to set up the
buildfarm for that reason). But maybe that doesn't matter too much to you.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thom Brown 2010-09-22 21:54:53 Re: Why is time with timezone 12 bytes?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2010-09-22 21:10:33 Re: Another Modest Proposal: Platforms