Re: Another Modest Proposal: Platforms

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Another Modest Proposal: Platforms
Date: 2010-09-22 21:10:33
Message-ID: 1285189833.25937.98.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 14:08 -0700, David Fetter wrote:

> It's not about naming platforms for exclusion. It's about requiring
> functionalities for *in*clusion.

I repeat:

> Perhaps you could suggest some more specific ideas of your proposal?

I mean, it took us forever to require Perl 5.8.

Joshua D. Drake

--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-09-22 21:46:48 Re: Git conversion status
Previous Message David Fetter 2010-09-22 21:08:42 Re: Another Modest Proposal: Platforms