Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> Cleaning up the parallel restore patch I came across a question I might
>> have asked before, but one which in any case I worked around:
>>
>> Why do we carefully define fseeko() for WIN32 but then not define
>> HAVE_FSEEKO, which makes doing the former pretty much pointless?
>
> With Andrew, I have developed and applied the attached patch so MinGW
> handles fseeko() translation similar to Unix.
>
> Someone will need to update MSVC to have similar behavior.
Which is what? :-)
It just needs to set HAVE_FSEEKO to 1 in pg_config.h?
//Magnus