| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: HAVE_FSEEKO for WIN32 |
| Date: | 2009-01-07 03:39:11 |
| Message-ID: | 200901070339.n073dBd03442@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> Cleaning up the parallel restore patch I came across a question I might
> have asked before, but one which in any case I worked around:
>
> Why do we carefully define fseeko() for WIN32 but then not define
> HAVE_FSEEKO, which makes doing the former pretty much pointless?
With Andrew, I have developed and applied the attached patch so MinGW
handles fseeko() translation similar to Unix.
Someone will need to update MSVC to have similar behavior.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| /rtmp/diff | text/x-diff | 4.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2009-01-07 03:56:50 | Re: parallel restore |
| Previous Message | Kalyankumar Ramaseshan | 2009-01-07 03:31:27 | Unicode support in postgresql code |