| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: HAVE_FSEEKO for WIN32 |
| Date: | 2009-01-07 13:52:10 |
| Message-ID: | 4964B38A.6050201@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
>> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>>> Cleaning up the parallel restore patch I came across a question I might
>>> have asked before, but one which in any case I worked around:
>>>
>>> Why do we carefully define fseeko() for WIN32 but then not define
>>> HAVE_FSEEKO, which makes doing the former pretty much pointless?
>>>
>> With Andrew, I have developed and applied the attached patch so MinGW
>> handles fseeko() translation similar to Unix.
>>
>> Someone will need to update MSVC to have similar behavior.
>>
>
> Which is what? :-)
>
> It just needs to set HAVE_FSEEKO to 1 in pg_config.h?
>
>
>
Yep. I have fixed it already.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-01-07 13:54:58 | Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1389) |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-01-07 13:45:45 | Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1389) |