| From: | Mark Mielke <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan |
| Date: | 2008-02-11 21:20:19 |
| Message-ID: | 47B0BC13.2000008@mark.mielke.cc |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andy Colson wrote:
> Robert Treat wrote:
>> Would a pre-requisite for any new SCM to be anointed as *the* new SCM
>> that the buildfarm can be reconfigured to run with it? Unless there
>> is an SCM2CVS option available I suppose... how many SCM's support
>> such a thing?
>
> I dont think the buildfarm needs to require CVS. The code can be
> changed in the buildfarm to just run 'svn up' or 'git up and go'
> (sorry, never used git so I had to guess at the command :-) ) right?
As long as the build farm never writes results - certainly. Any system
that pulls data from a central repository would work.
Cheers,
mark
P.S. Depending on configuration, it might be 'git pull'.
--
Mark Mielke <mark(at)mielke(dot)cc>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2008-02-11 21:37:58 | Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-02-11 21:18:12 | Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan |