Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan

Robert Treat wrote:
> On Saturday 09 February 2008 22:51, Christopher Browne wrote:
>> On Feb 9, 2008 4:58 PM, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I wonder if the efforts to provide mirrors for many different systems can
>>> hurt later down the road. It is pretty obvious that amost every current
>>> system has options to convert from or to mirror a CVS repository. But
>>> what if we someday really want to use something else as the master
>>> repository? Are we ready to accept losing unsupported mirrors at that
>>> time, or will that actually influence the choice (I think that it should
>>> not ... but I can hear the outcry already).
>> The primary reason for a "hue and cry" to happen would require several
>> prerequisites:
>>
>> 0. An SCM would be chosen to replace CVS. Let us identify it as SCM1
>>
>> 1. The ones hueing and crying would have chosen an SCM, SCM2, that
>> was different from SCM1, and, furthermore, one where there isn't any
>> "tailor"[1] available to permit translation of patches between them.
>> (I'm not sure that any of the options that people are thinking about
>> *aren't* on tailor's supported list...)
>>
>> 2. There is a further requirement for this lead to a "hue and cry"
>> that needs to be listened to, namely that some complex and
>> non-migratable processes have been set up that depend on SCM2.
>>
>> I think we can avoid this by declaring up front that its a Really Dumb
>> Idea to set up complex processes that depend on a particular
>> alternative SCM without the nice big fat caveat that "The PGDG has not
>> committed to migrating to any particular SCM at this time. Depend on
>> such at your peril!"
>>
>
> Would a pre-requisite for any new SCM to be anointed as *the* new SCM that the
> buildfarm can be reconfigured to run with it? Unless there is an SCM2CVS
> option available I suppose... how many SCM's support such a thing?
>

I dont think the buildfarm needs to require CVS. The code can be
changed in the buildfarm to just run 'svn up' or 'git up and go' (sorry,
never used git so I had to guess at the command :-) ) right?

-Andy