Re: Linking backend in one piece

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Linking backend in one piece
Date: 2008-02-22 16:38:53
Message-ID: 4633.1203698333@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Well, my goal here was that we could use both ways of building for a while
> because we have no experience with how long command lines and argument lists
> we can handle portably.

Yeah, I think it would be folly to assume that we can name all the
individual object files in one big command line. But isn't the current
patch trying to do exactly that?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-02-22 16:45:53 Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default
Previous Message Andrew Satori 2008-02-22 16:30:28 Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default