Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "Roberts, Jon" <Jon(dot)Roberts(at)asurion(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default
Date: 2008-02-22 16:45:53
Message-ID: 4729.1203698753@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Roberts, Jon wrote:
>> However, you can not create anything in Oracle without being given
>> permission to create it. The notion that you can create a function
>> because you have connect rights to the database is foreign to me.
>> Connect should mean connect, not connect AND create.

> You'd need more than that.

> For example, since we don't support temp functions, we should probably
> ban the creation of functions in temp schemas (which I found was possible).

What for? If you don't want someone to use a language, you should
either revoke his USAGE privilege on that language, or remove it
from his database altogether. We have plenty of access-control
mechanisms in place already, we don't need weird special-case
restrictions on top of those.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeremy Drake 2008-02-22 16:49:27 Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-02-22 16:38:53 Re: Linking backend in one piece