FW: [CORE] create database bug

From: Dan Gowin <DGowin(at)avantec(dot)net>
To: "Pgsql Core (E-mail)" <pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "PGSQL HACKERS (E-mail)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: FW: [CORE] create database bug
Date: 1999-01-25 17:06:37
Message-ID: 43A3A1806104D211988500A0C9B576EE7CE230@avantec_exc.avantec.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I've got the bug working on Sparc Linux also. Don't understand why
you can't recreate it.

D.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: Monday, January 25, 1999 11:21 AM
To: DGowin(at)avantec(dot)net
Cc: pgsql-core(at)postgreSQL(dot)org; kraken(at)blueriver(dot)net
Subject: Re: [CORE] create database bug

> All,
> If you create a database with "_" in the name some strange
> things
> occur. For example:
>
> 1) create database cfg_smb;
> ok
> 2) drop database cfg_smb;
> ok
> 3) create database cfg_smb;
> error: database already exists.
> 4) drop database cfg_smb;
> error: database does not exist.
> (Note: the database directory still exists, but no files are
> within it.)
>
> But on the other hand:
>
> 1) create database cfgsmb;
> ok
> 2) drop database cfgsmb;
> ok
> 3) create database cfgsmb;
> ok
> 4) drop database cfgsmb;
> ok
>
> Everything is fine.
>
> I don't know where the code is that handles the dropping of databases,
> but I would
> think this would be easy to fix.
>
> Versions this was tried on:
> PostgreSQL v6.4, PostgreSQL v6.4.1, PostgreSQL v6.4.2
> Red Hat Linux v5.2, Intel Pentium II 300 MHz

Can't recreate the problem here on bsdi and current development sources.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania
19026

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-01-25 18:04:12 Re: [HACKERS] Re: datetime regress test busted by incomplete checkin
Previous Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1999-01-25 16:25:16 Re: [HACKERS] Re: datetime regress test busted by incomplete checkin