Re: [HACKERS] Re: datetime regress test busted by incomplete checkin

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: phd2(at)earthling(dot)net
Cc: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: datetime regress test busted by incomplete checkin
Date: 1999-01-25 16:25:16
Message-ID: 36AC9AEC.240446B8@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Could you phrase the query in the same style as most of the other
> > tests (a style we inherited from the original sources),
> I got my style from the lines above my test.
> Of course, I can recreate the patch, but should I?

Naw. You're right...

- Tom

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dan Gowin 1999-01-25 17:06:37 FW: [CORE] create database bug
Previous Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1999-01-25 16:23:25 Re: [HACKERS] Re: alloca (was: Postgres Speed or lack thereof)