| From: | Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)slingshot(dot)co(dot)nz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS |
| Date: | 2002-08-10 05:13:23 |
| Message-ID: | 3D54A0F3.8030801@slingshot.co.nz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Lamar Owen wrote:
>
>And you added this by doing what, exactly? I'm not familiar with pg_dump
>largefile support as a standalone feature.
>
Enabling largefile support for the utilities was accomplished by :
CFLAGS="-O2 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64" ./configure ...
It seemed to me that the ability to dump databases >2G without gzip,
split etc was a "good thing". What do you think ?
>
>
>You have this wrong. The distributions do periodically sync up with my
>revision, and I with theirs, but they do their own packaging.
>
I see.... so if you enabled such support, they they would probably sync
that too ?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2002-08-10 05:25:25 | Re: [HACKERS] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS |
| Previous Message | Patrick Nelson | 2002-08-10 05:12:32 | Upgrading on RH72 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-08-10 05:16:20 | Re: [HACKERS] CREATE TEMP TABLE .... ON COMMIT |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2002-08-10 05:12:26 | Re: Proposal: stand-alone composite types |