RE: PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL

From: fabrizio(dot)ermini(at)sysdat(dot)it
To: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL
Date: 2000-11-13 17:16:39
Message-ID: 3A103007.2913.221DDB8@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

> Still...Regardless of what database they're running, either their
> abstraction layer is shit or their queries really need optimized. Is that
> perhaps why, even at 5 clients, the page views he shows never went
> significantly above 10/sec?
>
I think this could be because they used real killer pages in the test,
and maybe this also the reason PgSQL fared this good (I've always
been and I'm still a postgres fan, but looking at that results I've
been quite astonished!!). Have you looked the spec? If I remember
well, Tim was talking about executing cuncurrently a page that
joined a dozen tables and another that was doing
update/select/insert on the same tables. Under these condition, 10
pages/sec it seems lighting to me!!!!

bye!

/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/

Fabrizio Ermini Alternate E-mail:
C.so Umberto, 7 faermini(at)tin(dot)it
loc. Meleto Valdarno Mail on GSM: (keep it short!)
52020 Cavriglia (AR) faermini(at)sms(dot)tin(dot)it

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?= 2000-11-13 17:20:20 Re: PL/Perl and gcc
Previous Message Titus Brown 2000-11-13 17:01:39 PHPBuilder article --

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-11-13 17:22:09 Re: Details for planned template0/template1 change
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2000-11-13 17:02:17 Re: Details for planned template0/template1 change