| From: | "Robert D(dot) Nelson" <RDNELSON(at)co(dot)centre(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | davidb(at)vectormath(dot)com, Michael Fork <mfork(at)toledolink(dot)com>, "Poul L(dot)Christiansen" <poulc(at)cs(dot)auc(dot)dk> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL |
| Date: | 2000-11-13 16:22:00 |
| Message-ID: | 3A0FD0BB@rba6.rbapro.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
>I made it all the way through the article. I'll summarize it for you:
>Postgres - hooray!
>MySQL - boo!
Yeah, and that's about it. No analysis or anything. Disappointing, after
waiting so long for the pages to load.
>Since this is an open source database article linked off of slashdot, I
>imagine they're getting pounded.
Still...Regardless of what database they're running, either their
abstraction layer is shit or their queries really need optimized. Is that
perhaps why, even at 5 clients, the page views he shows never went
significantly above 10/sec?
Rob Nelson
rdnelson(at)co(dot)centre(dot)pa(dot)us
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2000-11-13 16:42:28 | Re: How do I list foreign key info/relation |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-11-13 16:18:05 | Re: PL/Perl |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-11-13 16:48:49 | Details for planned template0/template1 change |
| Previous Message | Poul L. Christiansen | 2000-11-13 15:58:57 | Re: PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL |