| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? |
| Date: | 2000-05-05 06:21:40 |
| Message-ID: | 39126874.874EA783@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> OK, I thought you might want to argue more strongly for adding the
> ODBC stuff while we had the chance ... but if you are happy with the
> status quo then I'm happy.
No, I've already been embarrassed once recently; don't want to touch
anything in the last few days. Especially since I've been *so* busy at
work and with the docs that it will be hard to give it enough
attention (even though in principle it is pretty trivial).
- Tom
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2000-05-05 08:16:27 | Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-05-05 06:12:35 | Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? |