Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
Date: 2000-05-05 06:12:35
Message-ID: 5490.957507155@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
> btw, I'm all for fixing pg_group (it is really nonoptional imho) and
> the ODBC stuff is noncritical since loading the contrib/odbc/odbc.sql
> is sufficient to get the functions or operators defined since the
> support code is already in the backend.

OK, I thought you might want to argue more strongly for adding the
ODBC stuff while we had the chance ... but if you are happy with the
status quo then I'm happy.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-05-05 06:21:40 Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-05-05 06:07:29 Re: 7.0RC2 compile error !