Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows
Date: 2012-09-03 17:49:58
Message-ID: 3339.1346694598@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 09/03/2012 12:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> My intentions over the next hour or two are to commit the
>> unix-socket-directory fix and then sync 9.2 pg_upgrade with HEAD
>> (ie, back-patch everything that's in HEAD except the int64-XLogRecPtr
>> changes). Will that cause any problems for what you're doing?

> No, go for it. I can sync up without difficulty. Does that include
> backpatching the exec_prog changes to 9.2?

Yes, nobody objected, so I'll do that too.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2012-09-03 18:28:49 Multiple setup steps for isolation tests
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2012-09-03 17:47:17 Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows