Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows
Date: 2012-09-03 19:05:00
Message-ID: 23014.1346699100@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> No, go for it. I can sync up without difficulty. Does that include
>> backpatching the exec_prog changes to 9.2?

> Yes, nobody objected, so I'll do that too.

And done. Please apply the other open fixes to both HEAD and 9.2.
Should be easy at this point.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-09-03 19:10:22 Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2012-09-03 18:57:08 Re: pg_upgrade del/rmdir path fix