Re: Ding-dong, contrib is dead ...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, ams(at)oryx(dot)com
Subject: Re: Ding-dong, contrib is dead ...
Date: 2006-09-05 20:35:49
Message-ID: 23538.1157488549@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Merlin,
>> well, I'm confused now. Tom said that cleaned up functions might be
>> sneaked into 8.2, which is what prompted my question.

> You're correct, he did. Tom?

Well, it's not like we're done with forced initdb's for 8.2, so I don't
particularly see the harm in adding a few more functions. I would be
against writing something large and complicated at this point, but these
functions are trivial (practically one-liners) and I don't think there's
a lot of debate needed about the API. The biggest part of the work
needed is to write the documentation --- but we'd have to do that for
Abhijit's patch too, since the userlocks docs presumably fall under GPL
along with the code.

So basically I don't see the point of investing effort in a
bug-compatible version of userlocks, when we can have something cleaner
and suitable for the long run with not very much more effort.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marko Kreen 2006-09-05 20:37:29 Re: [HACKERS] Gen_fmgrtab.sh fails with LANG=et_EE
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-09-05 20:24:52 Re: Ding-dong, contrib is dead ...