| From: | Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] libpq port number handling |
| Date: | 2009-09-25 17:38:58 |
| Message-ID: | 20090925173858.GM22438@samason.me.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 09:29:24AM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 20:36 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > BTW, are port numbers still limited to 16 bits in IPv6?
>
> Port numbers are in TCP, not in IP.
I'd checked that it should work with IPv6, but I hadn't realized that
it was because ports were at a different level of abstraction. This
mailing list is good for otherwise obscure details like that!
--
Sam http://samason.me.uk/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alban Hertroys | 2009-09-25 17:58:36 | Re: stored procedure: RETURNS record |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2009-09-25 17:37:34 | Re: Delphi connection ? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-09-25 17:51:55 | Re: syslog_line_prefix |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-09-25 17:25:35 | Re: Hot Standby 0.2.1 |